N’Assembly Transmits 2026 Constitution Amendment Bill to 36 State Assemblies

N’Assembly Transmits 2026 Constitution Amendment Bill to 36 State Assemblies

The National Assembly has transmitted the 2026 Constitution alteration bill to the 36 State Houses of Assembly for consideration, moving the proposed amendments to the next stage of the constitutional review process. The Clerk to the National Assembly, Kamoru Ogunlana, transmitted the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (Sixth Alteration) Bill, 2026 on Wednesday, September 16, 2026, following a directive from the National Assembly leadership. The state assemblies have been asked to consider the proposals and communicate their resolutions to the National Assembly within 30 days. States Required to Consider Bill The transmission is part of the procedure prescribed by Section 9 of the 1999 Constitution, which requires constitutional alteration bills to secure approval from at least two-thirds of the 36 State Houses of Assembly. Ogunlana said the National Assembly had commenced the next stage of the process by forwarding the bill to the state legislatures for consideration and approval. The state assemblies are expected to deliberate on the proposals independently and follow their respective legislative procedures before communicating their decisions. 30-Day Period Is Not Constitutional Deadline The National Assembly clarified that the 30-day period is an administrative timeframe and not a deadline imposed by the Constitution. “The Constitution does not prescribe a specific period within which the State Houses of Assembly are required to communicate their resolutions on a constitutional alteration Bill,” Ogunlana said. He explained that the timeframe was introduced to promote an orderly and timely conclusion of the amendment process. The Clerk also stressed that the transmission of the bill does not dictate how the state assemblies should consider the proposals. “The National Assembly recognises the constitutional responsibility vested in the State Houses of Assembly and respects their independence in the consideration of the Bill,” he said. Next Step Depends on State Assemblies Ogunlana assured that the National Assembly would continue to follow the constitutional requirements governing the amendment process. “Upon receipt of the resolutions of the State Houses of Assembly, the National Assembly will proceed with the necessary steps in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution,” he said.

Akpabio Not Bigger Than Nigeria’s Constitution – Natasha

Akpabio Not Bigger Than Nigeria’s Constitution – Natasha

  Suspended lawmaker, Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, on Tuesday, cautioned Senate President Godswill Akpabio against placing himself above the Nigerian Constitution. The senator also accused the Senate leadership of violating a valid court order by preventing her from resuming duties at the National Assembly. She disclosed this in an interview with journalists at the assembly complex. The senator representing Kogi Central arrived at the National Assembly complex to reclaim her seat following a ruling by Justice Binta Nyako of the Federal High Court, which nullified her suspension. However, she was denied entry by security personnel at the gate. Fuming after the incident, Akpoti-Uduaghan described the development as a deliberate act of contempt by the Senate, particularly targeting Senate President Godswill Akpabio. “Akpabio cannot be greater than the Nigerian Constitution. I want Nigerians to know that the Office of the Senate President doesn’t give me legitimacy as a senator. The fact that he has done an appeal does not invalidate the decision of Justice Binta Nyako, and that does not stop me from being a senator. “I got my legitimacy as a senator from the people of Kogi who voted me into office as senator,” she said. The embattled senator said her continued exclusion speaks volumes about the state of Nigeria’s democracy. “That I’ve been denied entrance to the National Assembly is a statement being made. It’s on record that the National Assembly under Akpabio has decided to be in contempt of a court decision, and it’s quite ironic that they are lawmakers. “That poses the question: how far is our democracy in this day and age?” she stated. Akpoti-Uduaghan also faulted the legality of her initial suspension by the Senate. “Even the suspension ab initio was fraudulent—the document was faulty,” she stated. She revealed that her legal team would be approaching the appellate court for further interpretation and redress. “Going forward, I will have a meeting with my legal team so they can proceed to the appellate court to seek interpretation into what just happened. I’m a law-abiding citizen,” she added. As of press time, the Senate leadership had not released any statement on Tuesday’s standoff at the National Assembly. Punch

PDP Leadership: Gov. Adeleke Affirms Support For PDP Constitution

    Osun State Governor, Sen. Ademola Adeleke has clarified his position on the raging leadership crisis rocking the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP). A statement by his spokesperson, Olawale Rasheed on Thursday, said the Governor declared that he stands by the relevant provisions of the PDP Constitution. “I stand by the Constitution of our great party which clearly spelt out the succession procedure in case of the exit of an elected chairman. “I also stand by the resolution of the PDP Governors’ Forum of which I am an integral part. “Our party must adhere to its Constitution at this critical time and at all times. That is the way to build a responsible political party.